We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies
International Journal of Evidence-Based Practice for the Dental Hygienist
Int J Evidence-Based Practice Dent Hygienist 2 (2016), No. 4     5. Dec. 2016
Int J Evidence-Based Practice Dent Hygienist 2 (2016), No. 4  (05.12.2016)

Page 242-245


Critical Appraisal of a Randomized Clinical Trial on the Effects of Silver Diamine Fluoride Compared with Fluoride Varnish on Dental Caries Arrest Rates in Preschool Children
Posorski, Ewa
Background: This article critically appraises an 18-month, double-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating caries arrest rates in three different groups utilizing topical application of 30% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) or 5% fluoride (NaF) varnish at varying intervals.
Clinical question: Is there a difference in the caries arrest rates among preschool children receiving annual application of 30% SDF, weekly application of 30% SDF for 3 weeks, or weekly application of 5% NaF varnish for 3 weeks?
Summary of methods: This RCT was conducted with 16 kindergartens in Hong Kong, a community with fluoridated drinking water. Carious lesions were assessed by visual and tactile detection. The study participants were randomly assigned to three parallel groups with no negative control group: group 1, an application of 30% SDF at baseline and repeated at 12 months; group 2, a weekly application of 30% SDF for 3 weeks; or group 3, a weekly application of 5% NaF varnish for 3 weeks. Follow-up examinations were conducted at 6, 12, and 18 months.
Critical appraisal: Based on an evaluation using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool, this study met all criteria for a credible RCT. The strength of the findings was low to moderate, given selective outcome reporting and subsequent potential for reporting bias.
Practical implications: The results showed that SDF had a faster rate of arresting dental caries than NaF varnish. These findings are of importance, as they are consistent with a growing body of evidence.